How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?
10.06.2025 00:04
But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.
John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”
Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.
Ukraine attacks Russian aircraft in far-reaching drone strikes - The Washington Post
But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.
Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.
A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.
Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.
For example, Jesus has a God …
The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.
So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?